Press enter or space to select a node.You can then use the arrow keys to move the node around. Press delete to remove it and escape to cancel.
Press enter or space to select an edge. You can then press delete to remove it or escape to cancel.
About This Automation
Reviewing transaction codes manually against GL standards is time-consuming and error-prone. Accountants spend hours each month checking codes, flagging exceptions, and waiting for manager approval before posting batches.
Automation compares every transaction code against GL standards instantly, flags exceptions with severity levels, and routes only high-risk items for human review. Batches post faster and coding accuracy improves dramatically.
Key features:
Validate transaction codes against GL standards automatically on every batch
Flag exceptions by severity and assign recommended corrections
Auto-correct low-risk coding errors without manager intervention
Route high-risk exceptions to managers with full context and reasoning
Generate exception reports that summarize all flagged items and decisions
Post approved batches to the general ledger on the same day
The issues teams report most often with this process
#
Friction point
Companies Report This
1
Manual code review bottleneck
Accountants spend 35 minutes per batch manually comparing codes against GL standards, creating a throughput ceiling.
80%
2
Manager approval delays
Manager review of exceptions adds 18 minutes per batch and often delays same-day posting by one or more days.
67%
3
High error miss rate
Manual review catches only 88% of coding errors, leaving 12% of exceptions undetected and requiring downstream rework.
53%
4
Exception report compilation
Accountants manually filter and summarize flagged rows, duplicating work that could be automated.
40%
5
Context switching overhead
Accountants switch between accounting system, spreadsheet, and email, losing focus and increasing error risk.
26%
DisclaimerAll data is based on anonymized FullSpec mapping sessions and proprietary industry research. Learn more
Automation readiness
How well-suited this process is for automation
Process Pain Score™Manual code review is repetitive, time-consuming, and prone to human error.
9.2/ 10
AI Fit Rating™Validation against fixed GL standards is highly structured; exception.
9.1/ 10
Automation Lift Index™Automation eliminates manual review, improves catch rate from 88% to 98%, and.
8.7/ 10
Hidden Overhead™Context switching between batch review, spreadsheet work, and email.
7.3/ 10
How The Automation Works
The full workflow, from trigger to completion.
Press enter or space to select a node.You can then use the arrow keys to move the node around. Press delete to remove it and escape to cancel.
Press enter or space to select an edge. You can then press delete to remove it or escape to cancel.
1. Batch uploaded to accounting systemtrigger
A new transaction batch is detected in the accounting system and is ready for validation.
2. Extract and validate codes
The automation retrieves the batch and runs each transaction code against the GL standards ruleset, checking for invalid codes, missing codes, and category mismatches.
3. Flag exceptions and assign severity
The automation evaluates flagged exceptions, assigns severity levels (critical, warning, info), and determines if each can be auto-corrected or requires human review.
4. Auto-correct low-risk exceptions
The automation applies corrections to low-risk exceptions (e.g., typos, obvious category mismatches) directly in the accounting system.
5. Create exception report
The automation generates a structured exception report, listing all flagged items, their severity, and recommended actions.
6. Notify manager
A message is sent to the accounting manager with a summary of exceptions and a link to the full report for review.
7. Post approved batch to GL
Once the manager approves the batch or via the report, the automation posts all transactions to the general ledger.
Everything you need to know before mapping this process.
Low-risk exceptions like minor code mismatches are corrected automatically. High-risk exceptions, such as unusual account combinations or policy violations, are flagged and routed to the manager with full context for human judgment.