Press enter or space to select a node.You can then use the arrow keys to move the node around. Press delete to remove it and escape to cancel.
Press enter or space to select an edge. You can then press delete to remove it or escape to cancel.
About This Automation
Vulnerability scan review and remediation is the manual process of extracting, deduplicating, and classifying security findings from automated scans, then creating tickets and notifying teams.
Automation extracts vulnerability data from multiple scan formats, removes duplicates, classifies severity, assigns ownership, and creates tickets with notifications in minutes. Teams focus on actual remediation instead of data entry.
Key features:
Parse vulnerability scan output in multiple formats and extract structured data automatically
Deduplicate findings by comparing CVE ID and affected assets against historical records
Classify severity and filter false positives using rule-based logic and historical patterns
Assign ownership and calculate remediation deadlines based on asset criticality and SLA rules
Create tickets in your issue tracker with all details and notify assigned teams instantly
Log scan metadata and audit trail for compliance reporting
The issues teams report most often with this process
#
Friction point
Companies Report This
1
Manual data extraction from reports
Parsing vulnerability details from multiple scan formats into spreadsheets is time-consuming and error-prone.
80%
2
Duplicate finding identification
Manually comparing findings across scans and tools leads to missed or redundant entries.
67%
3
False positive assessment
Determining which findings are actionable requires subjective judgment and context switching.
53%
4
Ticket creation and assignment
Manually creating tickets in your issue tracker and notifying teams is repetitive and delays remediation.
40%
5
Audit trail and compliance logging
Recording scan metadata and decisions manually increases the risk of incomplete or inconsistent records.
26%
DisclaimerAll data is based on anonymized FullSpec mapping sessions and proprietary industry research. Learn more
Automation readiness
How well-suited this process is for automation
Process Pain Score™Manual parsing and deduplication consume 65 minutes per scan; false positives.
8.4/ 10
AI Fit Rating™Structured vulnerability data, rule-based classification, and historical.
9.1/ 10
Automation Lift Index™Automation reduces cycle time from 176 to 30 minutes and enables 4x more scans.
8.7/ 10
Hidden Overhead™Context switching between tools, rework from false positives, and audit trail.
7.3/ 10
How The Automation Works
The full workflow, from trigger to completion.
Press enter or space to select a node.You can then use the arrow keys to move the node around. Press delete to remove it and escape to cancel.
Press enter or space to select an edge. You can then press delete to remove it or escape to cancel.
1. Scan Report Receivedtrigger
Vulnerability scan completes and report file is detected in the shared folder or email inbox. The automation platform retrieves the file and extracts the raw findings data.
2. Parse and Deduplicate Findings
The automation reads the scan output, extracts CVE ID, asset name, severity, and description, and compares against a database of previously seen vulnerabilities to remove duplicates and consolidate related findings.
3. Classify Severity and Filter False Positives
The automation applies a rule-based classifier trained on historical decisions to assign final severity, flag likely false positives, and recommend an action (remediate, defer, or close).
4. Assign Ownership and Timeline
The automation matches each vulnerability to the responsible team or asset owner based on asset type and criticality, and calculates a remediation deadline based on severity.
5. Create Jira Tickets
The automation creates a ticket for each actionable finding, populating title, description, severity label, assignee, and due date.
6. Send Notifications
The automation sends a message to the assigned owner with a summary of the vulnerability, a link to the Jira ticket, and the remediation deadline.
7. Log Scan Metadata
The automation appends a record to a Google Sheet with the scan date, tool name, total findings, actionable findings, and a link to the Jira filter for this scan.
Everything you need to know before mapping this process.
The automation reads vulnerability data from XML, JSON, and CSV formats produced by common scan tools, so you can consolidate findings from multiple sources without manual conversion.