Automate the manual work in TextSanity

FullSpec maps how TextSanity fits into your day-to-day, finds the repetitive work worth automating, and gives you a clear plan to connect it with the rest of your tools.

Explore ideas

TextSanity by the numbers

Insights from real process mapping sessions that involve TextSanity.

No processes mapped yet using TextSanity. Map a process that uses TextSanity to see automation data here.

Map a TextSanity automation

Top 5 TextSanity friction points when done manually

Manually checking TextSanity compliance before send

You have to stop and review every message in TextSanity to catch tone, clarity, or brand voice issues before hitting send instead of catching them automatically.

78% report this

Rewriting messages TextSanity flags repeatedly

TextSanity identifies the same communication problems in your messages over and over, forcing you to manually rewrite and recheck instead of learning from past corrections.

71% report this

Copying TextSanity feedback across team members

When TextSanity suggests improvements to one person's message, you have to manually share those insights with other team members who make the same mistakes.

62% report this

Tracking TextSanity suggestions without documentation

TextSanity gives you feedback on individual messages, but you have no way to track patterns or build a record of what communication issues your team struggles with most.

48% report this

Waiting for TextSanity review during time-sensitive sends

When you need to send urgent messages, manually running them through TextSanity creates delays because the review step cannot happen in real time.

31% report this

Data points based on anonymized data from FullSpec mapping sessions

What you can automate in TextSanity

Browse popular TextSanity automations FullSpec can map for you. Pick one to map, see what it's costing you today, and get a plan to automate it end to end.