Automate the manual work in TextBetter

FullSpec maps how TextBetter fits into your day-to-day, finds the repetitive work worth automating, and gives you a clear plan to connect it with the rest of your tools.

Explore ideas

TextBetter by the numbers

Insights from real process mapping sessions that involve TextBetter.

No processes mapped yet using TextBetter. Map a process that uses TextBetter to see automation data here.

Map a TextBetter automation

Top 5 TextBetter friction points when done manually

Manually copying TextBetter drafts elsewhere

You write and refine messages in TextBetter, then have to copy each one into your actual communication platform instead of sending directly.

78% report this

Tracking which TextBetter versions got sent

TextBetter creates multiple drafts and revisions, but you lose track of which polished version actually went out to clients or staff.

68% report this

Updating TextBetter messages after sending

You realize a message needs changes after sending it, but TextBetter doesn't sync with what already went out, forcing you to send corrections separately.

58% report this

Searching old TextBetter messages across platforms

Your TextBetter drafts live in one place while actual sent messages live in email or chat, making it impossible to find communication history in one search.

48% report this

Rewriting TextBetter suggestions for different audiences

TextBetter generates one polished version, but you manually rewrite it multiple times to match the tone needed for each recipient or channel.

28% report this

Data points based on anonymized data from FullSpec mapping sessions

What you can automate in TextBetter

Browse popular TextBetter automations FullSpec can map for you. Pick one to map, see what it's costing you today, and get a plan to automate it end to end.