Automate the manual work in Test IO

FullSpec maps how Test IO fits into your day-to-day, finds the repetitive work worth automating, and gives you a clear plan to connect it with the rest of your tools.

Explore ideas

Test IO by the numbers

Insights from real process mapping sessions that involve Test IO.

No processes mapped yet using Test IO. Map a process that uses Test IO to see automation data here.

Map a Test IO automation

Top 5 Test IO friction points when done manually

Manually tracking Test IO tester assignments

You spend hours updating spreadsheets to track which testers from Test IO are assigned to which test cycles instead of having that visibility built into your workflow.

78% report this

Chasing down Test IO bug report details

Testers submit findings through Test IO but you have to manually follow up with them for missing screenshots, reproduction steps, or environment details before you can pass bugs to development.

71% report this

Reconciling Test IO results with internal systems

Test IO generates reports in its own format, so you manually copy test results, pass rates, and coverage data into your internal tracking tools and dashboards.

64% report this

Scheduling and rescheduling Test IO test cycles

When timelines shift, you manually notify testers through Test IO, reschedule cycles, and update your project timeline documents without any automated coordination.

51% report this

Manually approving Test IO tester payouts

You review each tester's completed work in Test IO, verify hours and deliverables, then manually process payments or submit reimbursement requests through separate accounting software.

27% report this

Data points based on anonymized data from FullSpec mapping sessions

What you can automate in Test IO

Browse popular Test IO automations FullSpec can map for you. Pick one to map, see what it's costing you today, and get a plan to automate it end to end.