Automate the manual work in Dust

FullSpec maps how Dust fits into your day-to-day, finds the repetitive work worth automating, and gives you a clear plan to connect it with the rest of your tools.

Explore ideas

Dust by the numbers

Insights from real process mapping sessions that involve Dust.

No processes mapped yet using Dust. Map a process that uses Dust to see automation data here.

Map a Dust automation

Top 5 Dust friction points when done manually

Dust conversations scattered across channels

Team members ask questions in Dust but answers get buried in threads, forcing you to manually search through old conversations to find the same information repeatedly.

78% report this

Manual context switching between Dust and work

You have to leave Dust, find files or data in other systems, then return to Dust to share what you found instead of having information automatically available in the conversation.

68% report this

Dust responses require manual verification

When Dust provides answers or summaries, you still have to manually check them against source documents or systems to confirm accuracy before acting on the information.

59% report this

Onboarding new team members into Dust

New hires need to manually read through months of Dust conversation history to understand decisions, processes, and context that should have been documented elsewhere.

48% report this

Dust insights require manual follow-up actions

Dust identifies issues or opportunities in conversations, but you manually have to create tasks, send emails, or update systems to actually do something about those insights.

25% report this

Data points based on anonymized data from FullSpec mapping sessions