Feasibility & Acquisition Pipeline

Keep every potential acquisition moving through appraisal, feasibility, and board sign-off without work falling through the cracks.

592 hrs
All data is based on anonymized FullSpec mapping sessions and proprietary industry research. Learn more
Manual time identified
16
All data is based on anonymized FullSpec mapping sessions and proprietary industry research. Learn more
Companies have mapped
Map This Automation

About This Automation

Evaluating new property sites for acquisition requires manual research across planning records, environmental databases, and utility availability. This fragmented process consumes weeks of analyst time per site and delays deal progression.

Automation retrieves planning data, environmental records, and utility information automatically, then scores feasibility against developer criteria. Reports are compiled and distributed the same day, accelerating site evaluation and deal velocity.

Key features:
Retrieve planning history and zoning data from public council databases automatically
Check flood risk, environmental registers, and contamination records in parallel
Verify utility availability and access constraints without manual outreach
Calculate weighted feasibility scores based on planning, environmental, utilities, and market factors
Compile and distribute feasibility reports to stakeholders on the same day
Update deal status and notify the team automatically upon completion

Top friction points when done manually

The issues teams report most often with this process

#Friction pointCompanies Report This
1
Manual council database searches
Analysts spend 35 minutes per site manually searching planning portals, downloading documents, and cross-referencing zoning records.
80%
2
Fragmented environmental data sources
Flood maps, environmental registers, and contamination databases are checked separately, requiring multiple logins and manual note-taking.
67%
3
Manual feasibility scoring and entry
Analysts manually calculate weighted scores and re-enter data into spreadsheets, introducing calculation errors and duplication.
53%
4
Report compilation delays
Collating findings into a formal report takes 20 minutes per site and often requires multiple revisions before stakeholder sign-off.
40%
5
Utility verification bottleneck
Confirming water, gas, electricity, and access availability requires manual outreach or map checking, delaying feasibility decisions.
26%
DisclaimerAll data is based on anonymized FullSpec mapping sessions and proprietary industry research. Learn more

Automation readiness

How well-suited this process is for automation

Process Pain Score™Manual research across fragmented databases delays site evaluation by weeks and.
9.1/ 10
AI Fit Rating™Planning, environmental, and utility data are highly structured and available.
9.1/ 10
Automation Lift Index™Automation reduces per-site assessment time by 75% and accelerates deal.
8.7/ 10
Hidden Overhead™Context switching between databases, manual data entry errors, and delayed.
7.3/ 10

How The Automation Works

The full workflow, from trigger to completion.

1. New site prospect loggedtrigger

A new site record is created or, triggering the feasibility workflow.

2. Fetch planning and zoning data

The automation queries public planning APIs and council databases using the site postcode and address, retrieving planning history, zoning classification, and any outstanding conditions.

3. Check flood and environmental registers

The automation pulls flood risk, environmental contamination, and protected site data from public registers and logs results.

4. Verify utilities availability

The automation checks utility availability databases and appends water, gas, electricity, and road access status to the site record.

5. Calculate feasibility score

The automation scores the site across planning, environmental, utilities, and market factors using a weighted scoring model, then stores the score in the deal record.

6. Generate feasibility report

The automation compiles all gathered data into a structured report and stores it as a PDF attachment in the deal record.

7. Update deal status and notify team

The automation updates the deal status, posts a summary, and sends the feasibility report to stakeholders via email.

Most popular tool stack used

— the complete tool combinations companies use
1
52% of companies
3
15% of companies
DisclaimerAll data is based on anonymized FullSpec mapping sessions and proprietary industry research. Learn more

What you get when you map this process

Everything you need to understand, plan, and build your automation.

ROI and business case

What this process costs today and what changes once it's automated.

Launch schedule

What gets built, in what order, and what success looks like once it's live.

Process runbook

How the automation runs day to day, including exceptions and human decision points.

Developer handover pack

Full build spec, logic, and configuration — ready to hand off without a briefing call.

Integration and connections guide

Every tool connection, credential, and data mapping the build needs.

Test and QA plan

Every scenario checked and signed off before the automation goes live.

Recommended for you

Other high-impact processes teams commonly map alongside this one.

Frequently asked questions

Everything you need to know before mapping this process.

The automation queries public council planning databases, environmental registers, flood risk maps, and utility availability records. It retrieves the same information analysts would gather manually, but in minutes instead of hours.

View more FAQs
592 hrs
Time identified
Process pain:9.1/10
Mapped by:16 Companies

Map this to your business to get your exact numbers.

Map This Automation

No credit card required. It's free.

Page updated