Conflict Check Automation & Clearance

Running conflict searches across clients, parties, related entities in minutes.

660 hrs
All data is based on anonymized FullSpec mapping sessions and proprietary industry research. Learn more
Manual time identified
12
All data is based on anonymized FullSpec mapping sessions and proprietary industry research. Learn more
Companies have mapped
Map This Automation

About This Automation

Conflict checking is a critical compliance task that protects law firms from ethical violations and malpractice. Manual searches across multiple systems are slow, error-prone, and create bottlenecks that delay matter intake.

Automation queries all client records, prior matters, and opposing parties in a single pass, compiling a structured conflict report for attorney review. Matters with no conflicts are cleared the same day, and all stakeholders receive instant notification.

Key features:
Query client database and prior matters automatically to identify potential conflicts
Cross-reference opposing parties and related entities against all existing records
Compile a structured conflict report and flag high-risk matters for attorney review
Auto-clear matters with no conflicts found and notify intake team instantly
Update case management records and send engagement or rejection letters automatically

Top friction points when done manually

The issues teams report most often with this process

#Friction pointCompanies Report This
1
Manual database searches across systems
Staff must search multiple platforms separately, leading to incomplete results and missed conflicts.
80%
2
Scattered attorney conflict notes
Conflict information is stored in email, personal files, and case notes rather than a centralized system.
67%
3
Bottleneck in attorney review
Attorney availability delays clearance decisions and creates backlog in matter intake.
53%
4
Manual report compilation
Staff spend time formatting and summarizing findings instead of focusing on analysis.
40%
5
Delayed client notification
Manual processes cause 1-2 day delays before clients receive engagement letters or rejection notices.
26%
DisclaimerAll data is based on anonymized FullSpec mapping sessions and proprietary industry research. Learn more

Automation readiness

How well-suited this process is for automation

Process Pain Score™Manual searches across multiple systems create compliance risk and delay matter.
9.5/ 10
AI Fit Rating™Structured database queries and pattern matching are ideal for automation.
8.9/ 10
Automation Lift Index™Automation reduces cycle time by 84% and enables same-day clearance for.
8.5/ 10
Hidden Overhead™Context switching between email, spreadsheets, and case management creates.
7.1/ 10

How The Automation Works

The full workflow, from trigger to completion.

1. New Matter Intake Receivedtrigger

New matter record created or intake form submitted. Automation extracts client name, matter type, and any known parties.

2. Query Matter Database

Automation searches for existing clients, prior matters, and opposing parties matching the new client name and related entities. Results are compiled in seconds.

3. Cross-Check Attorney Conflict Notes

Automation queries a centralised conflict log or spreadsheet for any flagged relationships or undisclosed conflicts. This replaces manual email and file searches.

4. Generate Conflict Report

Automation compiles all findings into a structured conflict report with client name, prior matters, opposing parties, and risk flags. Report is formatted for attorney review.

5. Conflicts Detected?

Automation checks whether any conflicts or red flags were found. If none, matter is auto-cleared. If conflicts exist, report is routed to attorney for manual review.

6. Route to Attorney for Review

If conflicts detected, conflict report is sent to responsible attorney via email and notification for manual clearance decision.

7. Log Clearance Decision

Once attorney approves or rejects, automation updates the matter record with clearance status, decision date, and approving attorney.

8. Notify Client and Team

Automation sends engagement confirmation email to client (if cleared) or rejection notice (if conflict found), and notifies intake team to proceed or close the matter.

Most popular tool stack used

— the complete tool combinations companies use
DisclaimerAll data is based on anonymized FullSpec mapping sessions and proprietary industry research. Learn more

What you get when you map this process

Everything you need to understand, plan, and build your automation.

ROI and business case

What this process costs today and what changes once it's automated.

Launch schedule

What gets built, in what order, and what success looks like once it's live.

Process runbook

How the automation runs day to day, including exceptions and human decision points.

Developer handover pack

Full build spec, logic, and configuration — ready to hand off without a briefing call.

Integration and connections guide

Every tool connection, credential, and data mapping the build needs.

Test and QA plan

Every scenario checked and signed off before the automation goes live.

Recommended for you

Other high-impact processes teams commonly map alongside this one.

Frequently asked questions

Everything you need to know before mapping this process.

The automation flags the conflict and routes the matter to the responsible attorney with a detailed report. The attorney makes the final determination on whether to accept or decline the engagement.

View more FAQs
660 hrs
Time identified
Process pain:9.5/10
Mapped by:12 Companies

Map this to your business to get your exact numbers.

Map This Automation

No credit card required. It's free.

Page updated