Automate the manual work in SentryKit

FullSpec maps how SentryKit fits into your day-to-day, finds the repetitive work worth automating, and gives you a clear plan to connect it with the rest of your tools.

Explore ideas

SentryKit by the numbers

Insights from real process mapping sessions that involve SentryKit.

No processes mapped yet using SentryKit. Map a process that uses SentryKit to see automation data here.

Map a SentryKit automation

Top 5 SentryKit friction points when done manually

Manual SentryKit alert triage across teams

You spend hours each day sorting through SentryKit alerts by hand to figure out which ones your team should actually fix versus which are false positives or duplicates.

78% report this

Copying SentryKit errors into ticketing systems

Every time a critical error appears in SentryKit, you have to manually copy the stack trace and details into your project management tool to create a task for developers.

71% report this

Tracking SentryKit issue status across platforms

You lose track of which SentryKit issues have been resolved because you are updating status in SentryKit, your ticketing system, and Slack all separately with no way to sync them.

64% report this

Generating SentryKit reports for stakeholders

Creating weekly or monthly reports on error trends from SentryKit requires you to export data, clean it up in a spreadsheet, and manually format it for leadership reviews.

52% report this

Notifying teams of SentryKit regressions

When SentryKit detects that an old error has returned, you have to manually check the history and send messages to the right people instead of having automatic escalation.

27% report this

Data points based on anonymized data from FullSpec mapping sessions

What you can automate in SentryKit

Browse popular SentryKit automations FullSpec can map for you. Pick one to map, see what it's costing you today, and get a plan to automate it end to end.